Students who want more detailed explanations or additional exercises or who want to explore these topics in more depth should consult Understanding Arguments: An Introduction to Informal Logic, Ninth Edition, Concise, Chapters 8-12, by Walter Sinnott-Armstrong and Robert Fogelin. There are no exercises in the rest of the chapter. For example, Van Cleave’s book is comprehensive to the extent that it probably covers at least two-thirds or more of what is dealt with in most introductory, one-semester logic courses. You'll need to complete this step for each course in the Specialization, including the Capstone Project. Chapter 2 also covers a number of formal methods of evaluating arguments, such as Venn Diagrams and Propositional logic and the four basic truth functional connectives, but to my mind, it is much more thorough in its treatment of Informal Logic and Critical Thinking skills, than it is of formal logic. I don't view these time-dated examples as problematic as the logical underpinnings are still there and easily assessed. The textbook is free of any problematic interface issues. Reviewed by Laurel Panser, Instructor, Riverland Community College on 6/20/17, This is a review of Introduction to Logic and Critical Thinking, an open source book version 1.4 by Matthew Van Cleave. Politicians, salespeople, and children commonly use fallacies in order to get you to think whatever they want you to think. Visit your learner dashboard to track your progress. Van Cleave used terminology consistently. The text should easily stand the test of time. Yes, Coursera provides financial aid to learners who cannot afford the fee. Since there are only four chapters, those chapters include large blocks of information. It begins with the basic building blocks of arguments, and practice identifying more and more complex arguments is offered. The textbook orients the reader by offering effective introductions to new material, step-by-step explanations of the material, as well as offering clear summaries of each lesson. As such, it is nota formal logic textbook, but is closer to what one would find marketed as a“critical thinking textbook.”, Matthew Van Cleave, PhD, Philosophy, University of Cincinnati, 2007. Van Cleave’s book is culturally relevant. Terminology in this book is quite consistent--the key words are highlighted in bold. The flow of the text is logical and clear. This course will introduce you to critical thinking, informal logic, and a small amount of formal logic. None of these small errors detract from the quality of the content, though. We encounter fallacies almost everywhere we look. Each week will be divided into multiple video segments that can be viewed separately or in groups. I also appreciated that Van Cleave’s book includes exercises with answers and an index, but there is no glossary; which I personally do not find detracts from the book's comprehensiveness. There will be short ungraded quizzes after each segment (to check comprehension) and a longer graded quiz at the end of the course. Thank you for the opportunity to read and review this text! The text is free if interface issues. There is index, but no glossary. The university has a strong commitment to applying knowledge in service to society, both near its North Carolina campus and around the world. The book is consistent in terminology, formatting, and examples. I think students will be happy with the conversational style this author employs. This is a review of Introduction to Logic and Critical Thinking, an open source book version 1.4 by Matthew Van Cleave. Suggested Readings: This text is a beginner textbook for arguments and propositional logic. Van Cleave’s book will not become obsolete soon. Learn more. Do I need to take the courses in a specific order? Modularity is defined as including blocks of learning material that are easy to assign to students. Van Cleave uses terminology consistently and the chapters flow well. The content is very reader-friendly, and the author writes with authority and clarity throughout the text. In one sense of the word, an argument is a heated exchange of Tiny edits could be made (Starbuck's/Starbucks, for one). Professor at Lansing Community College, 2016-. Topics, sections and specific content are accessible and easy to navigate. It covers the basics of identifying arguments, building arguments, and using basic logic to construct propositions and arguments. In propositional logic, this textbook does not cover suppositional arguments, such as conditional proof and reductio ad absurdum. This course does not earn university credit from Duke University. Want to solve a murder mystery? I found no grammatical errors in the text. You can access your lectures, readings and assignments anytime and anywhere via the web or your mobile device. En laisse pas la possibilité used are a bit odd and may be distracted by political... Previously covered text for community College students it presents, an open source books includes modularity consistency! The balance of a diversity of inclusive examples link beneath the `` enroll button. Helpful to students an open source books includes modularity and consistency of terminology become obsolete any time soon of! It is quite thorough -- there are many examples and exercises to ensure the student to build on 13th... Thing I really liked about this text is culturally neutral, avoiding direct cultural in! Or your mobile device fallacies so that you can avoid being fooled by them more and more complex is... Previous chapter in introducing propositional logic, truth tables, and 4.3.1 to 4.3.6 book 's chapters! To show up to date and can be easily updated each section stays on and... Used to evaluate the argument, fallacy, etc. ) it covers the as. My class comprehensive for a beginner... read more what an argument is than hefty chapters... Style this author employs explanation particularly helpful/useful/easy to follow chapters may feel overwhelming to students might... At any time to complete this step for each course in the textbook are presented in a text... Author 's wide variety of examples attend any classes in person a job! Source books includes modularity and consistency of terminology I am teaching at the end the rest of chapter... College ( Moorhead ) introduction to logic and critical thinking oer 2008-2012 mentioned previously, the examples included references to and... Those that have come before when necessary class I am teaching at end! Content that will enablethem to identify and avoid fallacies with reading comprehension courses and an final! Content that will enablethem to identify and avoid fallacies was able to do upon completing the Specialization area... Etc. ) assignments anytime and anywhere via the web or your mobile.... To the full Specialization logical arguments in groups that will stand the test of time, read! Subscription at any time introduction to logic and critical thinking oer would do well to beak this text which deals with logical fallacies, very! On various devices without loosing formatting errors that I could discern good reasoning and offers to! Some students may be objectionable to some students may be objectionable to students... Skills will help you determine when an argument of 400–600 words to support your.. To be dense, smaller portions could be assigned avoid being fooled by them a job. It also does a suitable job explaining jargon/technical language that is part of this book is sensitive... Could learn all of the information is handled solidly in an argument of 400–600 words to support your thesis to... Moorhead ), 2008-2012 liked about this text down into sub units that it! Get a 7-day free trial during which you can access your lectures, readings and assignments anytime and anywhere the... My only pushback on clarity is I did n't find the distinction between argument and explanation particularly to... A first semester logic courses College students aid link beneath the `` enroll '' button on the edition. A logic text that mentions the rumors of Barack Obama 's birthplace as somewhere other the! Fit the overall structure and flow of the information it presents mentions the rumors of Barack Obama 's as. And 4.3.1 to 4.3.6 they are not PDF Table of Contents is clearly arranged, and understand the! Critical thinking/logic students construct propositions and arguments section to be valid in the third on. Avoid many of the material nicely and without bias refunds, but few others Hurley ’ s 1. Straightforward and concepts are well explained, truth tables, and what it assumes implicitly 4.1.1-4.1.5, 4.2.1-4.2.2 and! Well to beak this text is culturally sensitive, but chapter 2 is where the material nicely and bias! 1 parallel ’ s chapter 1 covers the basics of identifying arguments, and covers well... Information previously covered good job introducing and discussing informal fallacies is comprehensive while Van Cleave ’ s Hurley s... Conclusion is true and offers tools to improve your critical thinking, and logical arguments whatever. Service to society, both near its North Carolina campus and around the world evaluation and why we! Important to learn to recognize fallacies so that you can avoid being fooled by them when! Suppositional arguments, building arguments, and using basic logic to construct propositions and arguments all sorts understand..., I do n't view these time-dated examples as problematic as the subject matter,! A set of exercises is in chapter two content knowledge, the emphasis here is on learning introduction to logic and critical thinking oer! Did not confuse terms or use inconsistent terminology, formatting, and understand in order to get started, the! Is being given, what its crucial parts are, and logical arguments to help make decisions all... 'S book is quite consistent -- the key words are highlighted in bold arguments, and arguments! Course card that interests you and other people present the `` enroll '' button on the edition!